

This happens not because these things or groups of people are objectively responsible, but that this responsibility must fall on someone or something (Mestrovic, 2007). For example, animals and insects have been killed and driven out of European countries as scapegoats for the plague and other misfortunes.įauconnet expanded upon this concept by saying that all legal systems throughout the world, throughout all of history, are principled on the idea that someone or something must be sacrificed and must suffer as a way to create justice in response to a perceived misfortune.

These rites involve the processes of blame, sacrifice, and scapegoating.ĭurkheim believed that the most common piacular event in social life is death, and that someone or something must be blamed or scapegoated for every death.įor example, years of smoking and poor diet leading to a heart attack, or the inattention of a drunk driver.įauconnet (1920) elaborated on Durkheim's insight by saying that, historically, animals and inanimate objects as well as people and groups have been blamed, condemned, and punished as a way to atone for death. The first person to talk about scapegoating in a sociological context was Emile Durkheim, whose work was supplemented by his followers Marcel Mauss, Henri Hubert, Robert Hertz, and Paul Fauconnet (Mestrovic, 2015).ĭurkheim put forth a theory of scapegoating that connects perspectives in sociology, anthropology, psychology, law, and religion.ĭurkheim believed that, when a piacular event - any misfortune that causes feelings of disquiet and fear - occurs, both the individual and society are threatened with disintegration, and they resort to a specific set of rituals called piacular rites to regain the stability and sense of integration that they had lost. The Book of Leviticus, part of the Hebrew Bible, describes the sacrifice of goats during the holiday by throwing goats off of rocky headlands - the Azazel - who have symbolically had the sins of the community placed upon them.Ĭelebrants believed that this slaughter would bring atonement to their communities. Historians believe that the term scapegoat was first coined in the 16th century to describe the ritual animals that those in Jewish communities placed their sins onto in preparation for Yom Kippur by the Protestant scholar William Tyndale in his translation of the Hebrew Bible.

The word scapegoat is a compound of the archaic verb scape, meaning escape, and goat, a misreading of the Hebrew ʽazāzēl. Subsequently, the group can mistreat the scapegoat as an outlet for their frustrations and hostilities. The one doing the scapegoating can then use the mistreatment of the scapegoat as an outlet for their own frustrations and hostilities. Scapegoating is a way to analyze negative experiences in terms of blaming an innocent individual or group for the event. Scapegoating is the act of blaming an out-group when the in-groupĮxperiences frustration or is blocked from obtaining a goal (Allport, 1954).
